9-11 and Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot

3/3/2021

Email from Capt. Dan Hanley:

I have forwarded to you below an email sent to the FAA Hotline Team from an author and a private investigator, Declan Curran, who investigates aviation cases domiciled at an undisclosed global location for your perusal. Kindly forward this email to interested and concerned family members, friends, and neighbors.

The information and evidence contained therein clearly and conclusively demonstrates that the Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot was developed, produced, and installed onboard commercial jet aircraft prior to 9/11.

This system enables the electronic hijacking of a commercial jet aircraft inflight by remotely taking complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computers and guiding it to its target. Once engaged, the pilots cannot disconnect the system. 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers alleges that this system was, in fact, employed on 9/11 as the purported hijackers were too inexperienced to have flown the flight profiles that day.

Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.

Very truly,

Captain Dan Hanley (retired)
Director - 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers

Dear Sir/Madam,

As you are aware, Dan Hanley has case reference S202000617032 lodged with your organization.
He is a friend, and I am aware of his undertakings with the FAA to disclose the BHUAP systems aboard Boeing aircraft.
My belief is that Airbus aircraft also have this system installed.

I understand the FAA is disputing the installation of the Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot, alleging that although it was patented, it had never been installed in any aircraft. The FAA appears to be refusing to address and action the concerns Captain Hanley has raised with the FAA.

The information I provide below will validate that it does exist, and is installed in operating aircraft.
This is largely unknown by flight crew and airlines, essentially meaning any aircraft with the BHUAP system installed is being operated illegally because of the lacking knowledge of the existence of it, what it does, and how it works. This is in no way any reflection of any negligence by aircrew or airlines, simply that they hold an honest ignorance.

Boeing Patent BOEING BHUAP PATENT PDF.pdf

Retired Captain {name redacted} - also a friend of both myself and Captain Dan Hanley - brought a Civil Court Case against Boeing to force them to expose the BHUAP system aboard their aircraft. It is my understanding that although the case was thrown out by a fraud against the Court, Boeing admitted to the systems three days after the law suit was filed.

As mentioned by Patent Application Attorney, Ryan Connell Durham, from Dunkirk, Maryland, USA:
"You can proceed to make and sell a product embodying your invention while a patent application is pending...
...The process of obtaining a utility patent can take 2-5 years or more."

Captain {name redacted} has prepared a document outlining the BHUAP system; I quote a small portion, below.
"In late 1996, a laptop and a Mode-S Transponder was used by a Dalfort Aviation Services Engineer on a Grenough Airlines Boeing 757 to initiate the BHUAP system and take Uninterruptible control of the autopilot during an autopilot return to service flight test (weight off wheels and autopilot receiving simulated air data). The witness, an Avionics Technician named Wayne Anderson, was aware that the means by which the aircraft was being controlled did not appear on the type wiring diagrams. This is because BHUAP is embedded into the AIMS software and is not an extra ‘wired in’ system.

Wayne Anderson explained that the engineer was able to change autopilot settings such as heading, speed and altitude simply by uplinking new values to the Flight Management System at will, the aircraft’s autopilot system received the new settings and took action to accomplish them.

We would contend that this erratic flight trajectory was aimed at simulating an in-flight emergency of some sort, such as a cockpit struggle or a gyroscope failure."

This then dispels the myth that the BHUAP system couldn't have been installed. In fact, my case investigation into the 'disappearance' of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 [9M-MRO], on March 08 2014, firmly asserts that the BHUAP system and the Air Tranquilizer Injection [ATI] componentry of that system facilitated this 'event.' It is my belief after investigating the subsequent July 17 2014 case of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 [9M-MRD], that the same system was utilized. The truth behind MH17 has never been presented to the public, and there is substantial evidence to prove what happened with both flights, including their connections to each other.

I would expect that the appropriate division[s] of the Federal Aviation Administration do their job as mentioned below and within "Our Values" on your website, https://faa.gov/about/mission/

"Our Values
* Safety is our passion. We work so all air and space travelers arrive safely at their destinations.
* Excellence is our promise. We seek results that embody professionalism, transparency and accountability.
* Integrity is our touchstone. We perform our duties honestly, with moral soundness, and with the highest level of ethics.
* People are our strength. Our success depends on the respect, diversity, collaboration, and commitment of our workforce.
* Innovation is our signature. We foster creativity and vision to provide solutions beyond today's boundaries."

Captain Hanley has affirmed with me that he will continue to persevere with his intention to have the BHUAP system acknowledged, investigated, and ultimately the public informed accordingly, along with how this system and it's associated components were pivotal in the execution of the destruction of the New York Twin Towers and associated other crashes of 911, on September 11 2001. I wholeheartedly endorse his pursuit to expose this critical life and safety matter, and he has my resources and full support to achieve this.

Please follow-up with Captain Hanley regarding the BHUAP system and its exposure to the public. They have a right to know about these systems, and the truth behind 911. The flight specifics/settings, along with the lack of ANY relevant flight experience by the Muslin hijackers who are purported to have been behind 911, could not allow the configuration alleged to have been performed on September 11 2001. Experienced, qualified, commercial pilots have stated the flight plans were not executable through manual control, and that they could not perform them, even if they desired.

This then validates the assertion of automated intervention of the aircraft, in particular the BHUAP.

Yours sincerely,

[Emphasis has been added to portions of this email.]
Electronically sighted and approved by the author for emailing

Declan Curran
Senior Investigator.
Lies and Deception Investigation Agency
"Specializing in Aviation."